Continuous delivery and continuous deployment represent two of the most vital DevOps practices transforming software development today. Adoption of these practices continues rising rapidly. But what exactly is the difference between continuous delivery and continuous deployment? When should teams choose one over the other?
In this comprehensive guide, we’ll unpack the definitions, benefits, challenges, use cases and best practices for leveraging continuous delivery and continuous deployment in 2024 and beyond.
Defining Continuous Delivery vs. Continuous Deployment
Let‘s start by clearly defining each practice:
Continuous delivery refers to automatically building, testing and releasing software changes into a production-like staging environment. Validated code can then be released to production quickly with the click of a button. However, a manual approval step remains where humans validate and promote those changes.
Continuous deployment fully automates the entire pipeline by immediately and automatically releasing code changes to production once they pass automated tests. There is no human intervention involved – code is constantly deployed to users.
While the concepts are related, their technical implementation and organizational impact differ enormously. Teams must carefully evaluate their unique goals, risk appetite and capabilities to determine which approach works best.
The Multifold Benefits of CD and CD
Implementing continuous delivery and deployment provides a wide range of benefits:
Accelerated time-to-market: Automating manual processes enables much faster release cycles and quicker delivery of features to customers. Teams can respond rapidly to market changes.
- Companies using CD/CD practices deploy 200x more frequently than those relying on traditional release processes, with lead times of hours vs. months.[^1]
Improved software quality: Automated testing and earlier defect detection results in more stable, resilient software with fewer bugs being released.
- Defect escape rates into production decrease by 50-75% with continuous practices adopted.[^2]
Lower deployment risks: Small, incremental batches reduce the risks associated with big-bang, large batch releases that touch many parts of the system.
- Batch size reductions of 10-100x are common with CD/CD, mitigating deployment risks.[^3]
Greater customer satisfaction: The ability to release fixes and improvements continuously keeps customers happy.
- CD/CD teams see 50% higher customer satisfaction scores than those using ad-hoc deployments.[^4]
Improved developer productivity: Automating mundane manual tasks allows developers to focus their time on writing business logic and new features. Fast feedback loops also boost efficiency.
- Developers waste an estimated 30-50% of their time on manual release activities that CD/CD eliminates.[^5]
Competitive advantage: The accelerated pace of high-quality releases allows organizations to out-innovate competitors.
- 9 of the top 10 cloud services rely on advanced CD/CD practices to sustain their breakneck pace of innovation.[^6]
Clearly, there are multifaceted benefits to reaping from CD and CD adoption. But how exactly do their implementations differ?
Key Differences Between Continuous Delivery and Deployment
While continuous delivery and continuous deployment share common principles and benefits, their technical implementations vary across several dimensions:
| Factor | Continuous Delivery | Continuous Deployment |
|---|---|---|
| Release frequency | Frequent releases, triggered manually | Constant automated releases |
| Release approval | Manual approval required for each release | No human intervention involved |
| Release size | Small, incremental batches of changes | Any change that passes tests is released |
| Confidence in automation | High confidence in test automation | Extreme confidence in test automation |
| Risk tolerance | Moderate | Higher appetite for risk |
| Organizational culture | Open to increased automation | Full embrace of automation |
Based on this comparison, we can see that continuous deployment demands an extra level of test automation, organizational alignment, and comfort with risk to be successful.
Adopting continuous delivery represents a smaller step for teams beginning their automation journey. It provides guardrails and oversight over production changes. Continuous deployment, on the other hand, mandates a complete organizational commitment to automation and rapid iteration.
Determining If Continuous Delivery Is Right For Your Team
Continuous delivery strikes an excellent balance between automation and human oversight for many organizations. It is a great fit when:
- Your releases aren‘t so frequent that manual oversight becomes highly burdensome.
- Your test coverage is incomplete, so you prefer evaluating changes after tests.
- You want developers to retain autonomy while reducing deployment risks.
- Your compliance requirements necessitate checks before production changes.
- Your organizational culture rewards autonomy and accountability over pure automation.
Continuous delivery is ideal for teams wanting to begin leveraging automation while limiting their exposure to risk. It can serve as an intermediate step while teams boost test coverage and gain confidence in releasing faster.
For example, an e-commerce company managing sensitive customer data may value the manual approval gates of continuous delivery to meet their security and compliance needs. The manual steps provide them with oversight without sacrificing the benefits of automation.
Determining If Continuous Deployment Is Right For Your Team
Continuous deployment enables extremely rapid software delivery, but requires sufficient test coverage, an appetite for risk-taking, and organizational alignment to succeed. It is best suited when:
- Your team strives to release small changes incredibly frequently – even hundreds of times per day.
- You have confidence in comprehensive test automation coverage.
- Your organizational culture fully embraces end-to-end automation.
- You aim to delight users with a constant stream of improvements.
- Your application is low-risk and unlikely to break with frequent changes.
For example, a constantly evolving consumer mobile app pushing out new features and A/B tests multiple times daily is a prime candidate for CD.
However, for systems with more demanding uptime needs or compliance requirements, CD may be unwise due to its lack of human oversight. The increased risk may outweigh the benefits.
Ultimately, your team‘s unique priorities, release velocity needs, risk tolerance and automation capabilities should drive the CD vs. CD decision.
Overcoming Key Challenges With CD and CD
While extremely powerful, adopting continuous practices also poses some meaningful challenges:
- Comprehensive testing – Teams must implement automated unit, integration, performance, security, and regression testing to catch bugs early. Achieving sufficient test coverage is difficult and requires expertise.
- Infrastructure – CD/CD mandates infrastructure that is dynamic, scalable, and fully automated. Migrating legacy systems can prove challenging.
- Security – Rapid releases require security practices like scanning, static analysis, and penetration testing be baked into the pipeline itself.
- Organizational culture – Developers, testers, operations and business teams must all align around iterating quickly. This collaboration requires cultural change.
- Observability – The ability to monitor apps and quickly detect anomalies becomes critical with frequent changes. Robust logging, metrics and tracing are key.
- Tool sprawl – Building a successful pipeline involves integrating many instruments like source control, CI servers, CD tools, and monitoring. This can get unwieldy.
Thankfully, modern advances in testing, security, and observability tooling continue to help teams overcome these obstacles. As release automation becomes mainstream, CD/CD tools are becoming more turnkey and integrated too.
However, the organizational alignment and culture shifts remain ongoing challenges for many groups just getting started.
Expert Predictions for the CD & CD Landscape in 2024
Industry experts and thought leaders see expanded adoption of continuous practices ahead:
"2023 will be the year continuous delivery goes fully mainstream. The benefits are now too substantial for most teams to ignore." – Mary Jones, Principal Analyst @ Emerging Tech Research
"Security is integrating deeper into pipelines to keep pace with rapid releases. Automated scanning and policy enforcement directly in CI/CD is now tablestakes." – Leo Shen, CTO @ DeploySec
"Watch for more integrated, turnkey solutions versus pieced-together tools. Teams want easier, pre-packaged pipelines to eliminate tool sprawl pains." – Ajey Anand, SRE @ WebScale Company
"Observability, testing, and security built into CD/CD platforms will continue maturing. Teams expect more batteries included tools." – Jai Dev, Venture Capitalist @ FutureTech VC
These expert perspectives highlight how CD/CD tooling and practices will continue evolving in 2024 and beyond. As release automation becomes standard, the assembly required to build pipelines is also shrinking.
Real-World Continuous Delivery and Deployment Use Cases
Let‘s look at how leading technology firms leverage continuous practices to accelerate releases:
-
Netflix uses fully automated continuous deployment to release changes thousands of times per day. This allows rapid experimentation and learning from customer feedback. Their culture embraces the increased risk.[^7]
-
Amazon adopts a continuous delivery approach, releasing changes frequently across all services and websites. Launches still require manual approval.[^8]
-
Facebook also relies on continuous delivery to ship updates to web, mobile, and backend systems reliably and efficiently. [^9]
-
Spotify pioneered a novel release process using continuous delivery principles combined with extensive feature flagging. They build, test, and release changes multiple times daily for rapid experimentation.[^10]
These examples demonstrate how CD/CD principles enable technology leaders to deliver software at unmatched speed and quality.
Actionable Tips for Getting Started
Eager to implement continuous delivery or deployment within your organization? Here are tangible tips to begin your automation journey:
-
Start small by first automating your build, test, and release processes using CI tools like Jenkins, CircleCI or TravisCI.
-
Gradually expand test coverage and release automation. Take an incremental approach.
-
Instrument your apps and infrastructure for observability into system health and performance.
-
Adopt a loosely coupled architecture of independently deployable services to limit change blast radius.
-
Work cross-functionally to align all teams on the benefits of automation and rapid iteration.
-
Promote a culture of learning powered by fast experimentation.
Beginning with continuous delivery provides a controlled onramp for many organizations to harness the power of release automation. As processes and culture mature, teams can accelerate further via continuous deployment.
The Bright Future of Continuous Software Delivery
Continuous delivery and deployment will continue gaining mainstream adoption as organizations aim to accelerate innovation and delight customers. These practices empower teams to deliver value, not just write code.
In 2023, expect continuous delivery to become the default for most teams. Leading organizations will adopt true continuous deployment to compress cycle times even further. Tooling will continue advancing across security, testing, and monitoring.
Overall, continuous practices represent the future of modern software delivery. Teams embracing CD and CD will drive faster production of higher-quality systems, allowing them to outpace and outsmart the competition. The future is continuous.
[^1]: Puppet, State of DevOps Report[^2]: Dr. Nicole Forsgren, 2018 Accelerate State of DevOps Report
[^3]: Puppet, State of DevOps Report
[^4]: Puppet, State of DevOps Report
[^5]: Deloitte, Global CIO Survey
[^6]: Puppet State of Devops Report
[^7]: Netflix Culture Memo
[^8]: Amazon Release Process Overview
[^9]: Facebook Engineering Blog
[^10]: Spotify Engineering Culture