As an avid Amazon shopper and follower of the retail industry, I‘ve always been intrigued by the company‘s ventures into consumer hardware. From the early days of the Kindle e-reader to the more recent Echo smart speakers, Amazon has never been afraid to take risks and innovate.
One such gamble was the Fire Phone, Amazon‘s first and only foray into the smartphone market. Launched in 2014 with much fanfare, the Fire Phone aimed to take on established players like Apple and Samsung with a slew of unique features and tight integration with Amazon‘s ecosystem.
But as we all know, the Fire Phone ultimately fizzled out, leaving many to wonder what went wrong. In this comprehensive post, we‘ll take a picky shopper‘s look at the rise and fall of the Amazon Fire Phone. We‘ll examine the market conditions at the time of its launch, the phone‘s standout features, and the reasons behind its commercial failure.
So, let‘s dive in!
The Smartphone Market in 2014
To understand the challenges Amazon faced with the Fire Phone, it‘s important to contextualize the smartphone market in 2014. At the time, the industry was dominated by two players: Apple and Samsung.
According to data from IDC, in Q2 2014 (the quarter prior to the Fire Phone‘s launch), Samsung held a commanding 24.9% market share, followed by Apple at 11.7%. Other notable players included Huawei (6.7%), Lenovo (5.4%), and LG (4.9%).
| Vendor | Q2 2014 Market Share |
|---|---|
| Samsung | 24.9% |
| Apple | 11.7% |
| Huawei | 6.7% |
| Lenovo | 5.4% |
| LG | 4.9% |
| Others | 46.4% |
Source: IDC Worldwide Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker, August 14, 2014
As you can see, the market was highly consolidated, with the top two players accounting for over a third of all smartphone sales. This left little room for newcomers like Amazon to make a dent.
Moreover, consumer preferences were shifting towards larger screen sizes and higher-end specs. Phones like the iPhone 6 Plus and Galaxy Note 4, both released in the fall of 2014, exemplified this trend. The Fire Phone, with its 4.7-inch display and mid-range internals, was seen as underwhelming in comparison.
Standout Features
That‘s not to say the Fire Phone was without its merits. In fact, it introduced several unique features that set it apart from the competition. Let‘s take a closer look at two of them: Dynamic Perspective and Firefly.
Dynamic Perspective
One of the Fire Phone‘s headline features was Dynamic Perspective, a 3D effect created by four front-facing cameras that tracked the user‘s head movements. As you tilted the phone, the interface would shift and move, giving the illusion of depth.
Here‘s a video demonstration of Dynamic Perspective in action:
Pretty cool, right? Amazon touted Dynamic Perspective as a game-changer for mobile user interfaces, enabling immersive 3D experiences and more intuitive navigation.
However, in practice, the feature was more gimmicky than useful. Many reviewers found it disorienting and noted that it often got in the way of basic tasks like reading and web browsing. There were also few apps that took advantage of the 3D effect, limiting its appeal.
Firefly
Another headlining feature of the Fire Phone was Firefly, an object recognition tool that could identify over 100 million products, songs, TV shows, and more. The idea was to make it easy for users to find and purchase items using their phone.
To use Firefly, you simply had to point your Fire Phone camera at an object or listen to a song, and the app would display relevant information and purchasing options. Amazon claimed that Firefly could recognize:
- Over 70 million products
- 35 million songs
- 245,000 movies and TV episodes
- 160 live TV channels
Here‘s a promotional image showing Firefly in action:
In theory, Firefly was a clever way to leverage Amazon‘s vast product catalog and drive sales. But in practice, it was hampered by inconsistent performance and limited use cases.
As Ars Technica noted in their review:
Firefly is a neat parlor trick, but it‘s not always useful. It‘s great at identifying products and media, but it‘s not so hot at identifying landmarks or plants or animals. It‘s also not great at identifying products that are obscured or partially out of frame.
Critical Reception
Despite these unique features, the Fire Phone received mixed reviews from critics. While most praised the phone‘s build quality and novel 3D effects, they found the overall experience to be underwhelming.
The Fire Phone‘s software, a heavily modified version of Android called Fire OS, was a particular point of contention. Reviewers found it confusing to navigate and noted that it lacked key Google apps and services.
As The Verge‘s David Pierce put it in his review:
The Fire Phone is a remarkable achievement. It‘s a well-built, well-designed phone with some unique ideas about how to interact with devices. But there‘s no reason to buy one. It has features, not benefits. It has content without reason. It has stuff, but no soul.
Other outlets were similarly lukewarm. CNET gave the Fire Phone 3.5 stars out of 5, while Engadget scored it a 70 out of 100. The consensus was that while the Fire Phone had some interesting ideas, it fell short as a complete package.
Pricing and Availability
Another factor that limited the Fire Phone‘s appeal was its pricing and availability. At launch, the phone cost $199 on contract with AT&T or $649 unlocked. This put it in the same price range as more established phones like the iPhone 5s and Galaxy S5.
Many consumers balked at paying a premium price for an unproven device, especially one locked to a single carrier. As Wired noted at the time:
The most logical reason Amazon might have stuck with an exclusive carrier partnership and high on-contract price is because it thought the Fire Phone would be a surefire hit. But by pricing it at the high end and limiting its availability, Amazon risked cutting out a huge swath of potential customers.
This prediction proved prescient, as the Fire Phone struggled to gain traction with consumers. According to estimates from comScore, the Fire Phone accounted for less than 0.1% of smartphones in use in the US in its first few months on the market.
Lessons Learned
So, what can we learn from the Fire Phone‘s failure? Here are a few key takeaways:
-
Brand recognition isn‘t everything. While Amazon is a household name in e-commerce, that cachet didn‘t necessarily translate to the smartphone market. Consumers were hesitant to take a chance on an untested device, especially at a premium price point.
-
Gimmicks don‘t equal value. Features like Dynamic Perspective and Firefly were certainly attention-grabbing, but they didn‘t provide enough everyday utility to justify the Fire Phone‘s cost. Novelty only goes so far.
-
Integration has its limits. One of Amazon‘s selling points for the Fire Phone was its tight integration with the company‘s ecosystem of products and services. But this also proved to be a double-edged sword, as it made the phone feel more like a vehicle for consumption than a versatile tool.
-
Carrier exclusivity is risky. By launching exclusively on AT&T, Amazon limited the Fire Phone‘s potential reach and appeal. While carrier partnerships can provide marketing and distribution benefits, they also introduce a significant barrier to adoption.
Looking Ahead
Since the Fire Phone‘s demise, Amazon has shifted its mobile strategy towards partnerships and services. Rather than producing its own phones, the company has focused on integrating its Alexa voice assistant and app store into third-party devices.
For example, in 2018, Amazon announced a partnership with Motorola to preload Alexa on certain smartphone models. The company has also worked with brands like Sony, Nokia, and LG to bring Alexa to their devices.
This approach allows Amazon to expand its reach and gather valuable data without the risks and costs associated with hardware development. It‘s a pragmatic pivot that plays to the company‘s strengths in software and services.
That said, I wouldn‘t rule out the possibility of Amazon re-entering the smartphone market someday. With its vast resources and willingness to experiment, the company could still make a splash if it learns from the Fire Phone‘s mistakes.
Conclusion
The Amazon Fire Phone may have been a commercial flop, but it remains a fascinating case study in tech industry hubris and innovation. By attempting to break into a mature market with a premium device, Amazon overestimated its own brand appeal and underestimated the challenges of differentiation.
At the same time, the Fire Phone introduced some genuinely novel features and functionalities. Dynamic Perspective and Firefly, while flawed, hinted at new possibilities for mobile interaction and commerce. In that sense, the Fire Phone was ahead of its time.
As Amazon continues to expand its hardware offerings and integrate its services into third-party devices, it‘s clear that the company hasn‘t given up on the mobile space. Whether we‘ll ever see another Amazon-branded phone remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the Fire Phone‘s legacy will continue to shape the company‘s strategy and ambitions for years to come.
What do you think? Did you ever use a Fire Phone? Would you buy an Amazon smartphone today? Let me know in the comments below!
